↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of migraine and other types of headache in Asia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiology of migraine and other types of headache in Asia
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, April 2003
DOI 10.1007/s11910-003-0060-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuu-Jiun Wang

Abstract

Earlier studies have raised the issue that Asians have a much lower migraine prevalence than Westerners. This article reviews the recent epidemiologic studies of headache in Asia using International Headache Society (IHS) classification criteria. Except for the Korean study and the first Hong Kong study (1992 to 1993), the prevalence of migraine has been quite consistent, ranging from 8.4% to 12.7%. The sex-specific migraine prevalence was 11.3% to 14.4% in women and 3.6% to 6.7% in men. The prevalence of IHS tension-type headache has also been similar among these studies (15.6% to 25.7%). The consistency of the prevalence of migraine and tension-type headache among these Asian countries is interesting in a region where the cultural background and development are so diverse. These IHS migraine surveys show that migraine is a significant disease in Asia and that its prevalence rate is close to but in the low range of the those reported in Western countries. Two surveys of chronic daily headache conducted in Taiwan, one in the general population and the other in the elderly population, have also revealed prevalence rates (3.2% to 3.9%) similar to those of Western countries (3.0% to 4.7%). The geographic or ethnic diversity of migraine or other types of headache could be downplayed if a similar epidemiologic methodology and an identical case definition were used in the surveys among different regions of the world.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lebanon 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 34%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 25 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,513,013
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#447
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,686
of 62,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them