| Title |
Men Who Have Sex with Transgender Women: Challenges to Category-based HIV Prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AIDS and Behavior, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10461-007-9303-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Don Operario, Jennifer Burton, Kristen Underhill, Jae Sevelius |
| Abstract |
Although transgender women are acknowledged as a priority population for HIV prevention, there is little knowledge on men who have sex with transgender women (MSTGWs). MSTGWs challenge conventional sexual orientation categories in public health and HIV prevention research, and warrant increased attention from the public health community. This paper used qualitative techniques to analyze how MSTGWs describe their sexual orientation identities, and to explore the correspondence between men's identities and sexual behaviors with transgender women. We conducted in-depth semi-structured individual interviews with 46 MSTGWs in San Francisco. We observed a diversity in the ways participants identified and explained their sexual orientation, and found no consistent patterns between how men described their sexual orientation identity versus their sexual behavior and attraction to transgender women. Findings from this qualitative study question the utility of category-based approaches to HIV prevention with MSTGWs and offer insights into developing HIV interventions for these men. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 28 | 32% |
| Psychology | 20 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,640,330
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#532
of 3,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,957
of 79,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.