↓ Skip to main content

The analysis of comet mass spectrometric data

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, April 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The analysis of comet mass spectrometric data
Published in
Space Science Reviews, April 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00178408
Authors

S. P. Balm, J. P. Hare, H. W. Kroto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 27%
Physics and Astronomy 2 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,404,662
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#462
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,098
of 17,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them