↓ Skip to main content

インド市場の構造変化による家電メーカーの 事業戦略の見直しと課題

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asian Management Studies, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
インド市場の構造変化による家電メーカーの 事業戦略の見直しと課題
Published in
Journal of Asian Management Studies, January 2018
DOI 10.20784/jamsjsaam.23.0_179
Authors

洪 性奉

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,942,734
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asian Management Studies
#1
of 18 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,841
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asian Management Studies
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them