↓ Skip to main content

The female orgasm: Pelvic contractions

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 1982
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
The female orgasm: Pelvic contractions
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf01541570
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph G. Bohlen, James P. Held, Margaret Olwen Sanderson, Andrew Ahlgren

Abstract

Eleven nulliparous women manually self-stimulated to orgasm, each on three separate occasions. Pelvic contraction pressure was measured by an anal probe and a vaginal probe simultaneously. Near the perceived start of orgasm, a series of regular contractions began in nine of the women. Anal and vaginal contraction waveforms were synchronized with each other, and the same number of orgasmic contractions occurred in each lumen. Anal pressure had a higher resting baseline and greater amplitude contractions than vaginal pressure. The perceived start of orgasm did not correspond precisely with the onset of regular contractions. Mean intercontraction intervals increased linearly at an increment of about 0.1 second through the series of regular contractions. Amplitudes of contraction pressure waveforms, representing pelvic muscular force, were initially low, increased through the first half of the regular series, and then decreased. Area and net area of the pressure waveforms, reflecting pelvic muscular exertion (force x time), increased during the regular orgasmic contractions. Three of the women's orgasms consistently included only a series of regular contractions (orgasm type I). For six other women, orgasms consistently continued beyond the regular series with additional irregular contractions (orgasm type II). Types I and II had been identified previously in men. Two women had no regular contractions during reported orgasms. This pattern, type IV, had not been recorded in men. Women of different types showed marked differences in orgasm duration and number of contractions. Identification of these types in subjects is important for meaningful comparison of contraction parameters in different studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#571,837
of 25,042,800 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#327
of 3,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 7,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,042,800 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them