You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of the psychometric properties of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) family of measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-3-76 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane E Pirkis, Philip M Burgess, Pia K Kirk, Sarity Dodson, Tim J Coombs, Michelle K Williamson |
| Abstract |
The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales was developed to routinely measure outcomes for adults with mental illness. Comparable instruments were also developed for children and adolescents (the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents) and older people (the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+). All three are being widely used as outcome measures in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. There is, however, no comprehensive review of these instruments. This paper fills this gap by reviewing the psychometric properties of each. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,148,744
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#835
of 2,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,644
of 148,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.