↓ Skip to main content

Ludwig Haberlandt – "Grandfather of the Pill"

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Medica Austriaca, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Ludwig Haberlandt – "Grandfather of the Pill"
Published in
Acta Medica Austriaca, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00508-009-1271-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl Djerassi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Physics and Astronomy 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#284
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,413
of 176,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.