↓ Skip to main content

活動写真の女優とは誰か

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 136)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
活動写真の女優とは誰か
Published in
JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES, January 2009
DOI 10.24460/mscom.74.0_115
Authors

田村 千穂

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,879,916
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES
#17
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,481
of 183,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them