↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial lipases: an overview of production, purification and biochemical properties

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
wikipedia
22 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
873 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1096 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Bacterial lipases: an overview of production, purification and biochemical properties
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00253-004-1568-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Gupta, N. Gupta, P. Rathi

Abstract

Lipases, triacylglycerol hydrolases, are an important group of biotechnologically relevant enzymes and they find immense applications in food, dairy, detergent and pharmaceutical industries. Lipases are by and large produced from microbes and specifically bacterial lipases play a vital role in commercial ventures. Some important lipase-producing bacterial genera include Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Burkholderia. Lipases are generally produced on lipidic carbon, such as oils, fatty acids, glycerol or tweens in the presence of an organic nitrogen source. Bacterial lipases are mostly extracellular and are produced by submerged fermentation. The enzyme is most commonly purified by hydrophobic interaction chromatography, in addition to some modern approaches such as reverse micellar and aqueous two-phase systems. Most lipases can act in a wide range of pH and temperature, though alkaline bacterial lipases are more common. Lipases are serine hydrolases and have high stability in organic solvents. Besides these, some lipases exhibit chemo-, regio- and enantioselectivity. The latest trend in lipase research is the development of novel and improved lipases through molecular approaches such as directed evolution and exploring natural communities by the metagenomic approach.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,096 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 6 <1%
Colombia 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 1057 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 190 17%
Student > Master 185 17%
Student > Bachelor 173 16%
Researcher 129 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 64 6%
Other 136 12%
Unknown 219 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 362 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 180 16%
Chemistry 113 10%
Engineering 58 5%
Environmental Science 37 3%
Other 99 9%
Unknown 247 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,292
of 8,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,875
of 143,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.