↓ Skip to main content

Observations on the meat-eating behavior of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Republic of Zaire

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, April 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Observations on the meat-eating behavior of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Republic of Zaire
Published in
Primates, April 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02382754
Authors

Hiroshi Ihobe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 47%
Psychology 6 9%
Environmental Science 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#470
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,471
of 19,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.