↓ Skip to main content

Compression of a giant pseudomeningocele causing transient anoxic seizures—a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Compression of a giant pseudomeningocele causing transient anoxic seizures—a case report
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00701-017-3446-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alhafidz Hamdan, A. Saxena, G. Rao, M. Ivanov

Abstract

Transient anoxic seizure upon application of pressure on a giant pseudomeningocele has never been reported in the literature; such abrupt changes in intracranial pressure due to large volume of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) translocation, if left untreated may lead to permanent cerebral hypoxic injury and death. Here we describe a case of a 26-year-old woman who had undergone lumbar disc surgery in another unit few months ago and developed a large lump around her back. Any pressure on the lump resulted in headaches and at times episodes of seizures. Clinical examination revealed a very large fluid-filled lump consistent with a giant pseudomeningocele, confirmed by an MRI. A video EEG while applying pressure on the lump was recorded. The patient developed a typical seizure attack with a characteristic pattern of cerebral anoxia, and a paired ECG showed irregular rhythm with junctional and ventricular ectopic beats during the latter part of the attack, raising a suspicion of asystole. Upon relieving the pressure off the lump, the patient gradually regained consciousness with no permanent neurological deficit. We then discuss the pathophysiology of anoxic seizures and highlight the need to be vigilant in managing patients with such lesions in order to prevent permanent cerebral hypoxic injury and death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Neuroscience 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,458,307
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1,689
of 1,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,441
of 442,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#25
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,934 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.