↓ Skip to main content

Economy and efficiency of swimming at the surface with fins of different size and stiffness

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Economy and efficiency of swimming at the surface with fins of different size and stiffness
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00421-005-0075-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Zamparo, David R. Pendergast, Albert Termin, Alberto E. Minetti

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how fins with varying physical characteristics affect the energy cost and the efficiency of aquatic locomotion. Experiments were performed on ten college swimmers who were asked to swim the dolphin kick while using a monofin (MF) and to swim the front crawl kick with a small-flexible fin (SF), a large-stiff fin (LS) and without fins (BF, barefoot). The energy expended to cover one unit distance (C) was highest for BF (C=10.6+/-1.8 kJ m(-1) kg(-1) at 0.8 m s(-1)) and decreased by about 50% with LS, 55% with SF and 60% with MF, allowing for an increase in speed (for a given metabolic power) of about 0.4 m s(-1) for MF and of about 0.2 m s(-1) for SF and LS (compared with BF). At any given speed, the fins for which C was lower were those with the lowest kick frequency (KF): KF=1.6+/-0.22 Hz at 0.8 m s(-1) (for BF) and decreased by about 40% for SF, 50% for LS and 60% for MF. The decrease in KF from BF to SF-LS and MF was essentially due to the increasing surface area of the fin which, in turn, was associated with a higher Froude efficiency (eta(F)). eta(F) was calculated by computing the speed of the bending waves moving along the body in a caudal direction (as proposed for the undulating movements of slender fish): it increased from 0.62+/-0.01 in BF to 0.66+/-0.03 in SF and 0.67+/-0.04 in LS reaching the highest values (0.76+/-0.05) with MF. No single fin characteristic can predict a swimmer's performance, rather the better fin (i.e. MF) is the one that is able to reduce most KF at any given speed and hence to produce the greatest distance per kick (d=v/KF). The latter indeed increased from 0.50+/-0.01 m in BF to about 0.90+/-0.05 m in SF and LS and reached values of 1.22+/-0.01 m in MF.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 21%
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Professor 7 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 40 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,159
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,285
of 166,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.