↓ Skip to main content

Multifractal Modeling and Lacunarity Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematical Geosciences, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Multifractal Modeling and Lacunarity Analysis
Published in
Mathematical Geosciences, October 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1022355723781
Authors

Qiuming Cheng

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
China 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 18%
Engineering 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Geosciences
#57
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,366
of 28,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Geosciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.