You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geology and complex collapse mechanisms of the 3.72 Ma Hannegan caldera, North Cascades, Washington, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geological Society of America Bulletin, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1130/b25904.1 |
| Authors |
David Tucker, Wes Hildreth, Tom Ullrich, Richard Friedman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 69% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,737,238
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#1,116
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,557
of 76,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them