↓ Skip to main content

A Critique of the Proposed DSM-V Diagnosis of Pedophilia

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
A Critique of the Proposed DSM-V Diagnosis of Pedophilia
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10508-010-9604-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

William O’Donohue

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 52%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,124
of 3,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,502
of 93,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.