↓ Skip to main content

Patent foramen ovale closure and migraine: Are we following the wrong pathway?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Patent foramen ovale closure and migraine: Are we following the wrong pathway?
Published in
Journal of Neurology, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00415-009-0126-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Sarens, Luc Herroelen, Kristien Van Deyk, Werner Budts

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Saudi Arabia 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 14%
Other 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Other 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 86%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,769
of 4,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,886
of 171,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#24
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.