You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Knowledge Translation in Men’s Health Research: Development and Delivery of Content for Use Online
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2196/jmir.3881 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Lohan, Áine Aventin, John L Oliffe, Christina S Han, Joan L Bottorff |
| Abstract |
Men can be hard to reach with face-to-face health-related information, while increasingly, research shows that they are seeking health information from online sources. Recognizing this trend, there is merit in developing innovative online knowledge translation (KT) strategies capable of translating research on men's health into engaging health promotion materials. While the concept of KT has become a new mantra for researchers wishing to bridge the gap between research evidence and improved health outcomes, little is written about the process, necessary skills, and best practices by which researchers can develop online knowledge translation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 22% |
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 19% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 20% |
| Researcher | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 71 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,860,809
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,529
of 7,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,277
of 363,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#26
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.