| Title |
Bibliometric Analyses Reveal Patterns of Collaboration between ASMS Members
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13361-017-1846-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magnus Palmblad, Nees Jan van Eck |
| Abstract |
We have explored the collaborative network of the current American Society for Mass Spectrometry (ASMS) membership using bibliometric methods. The analysis shows that 4249 members are connected in a single, large, co-authorship graph, including the majority of the most published authors in the field of mass spectrometry. The map reveals topographical differences between university groups and national laboratories, and that the co-authors with the strongest links have long worked together at the same location. We have collected and summarized information on the geographical distribution of members, showing a high coverage of active researchers in North America and Western Europe. Looking at research fields, we could also identify a number of new or 'hot' topics among ASMS members. Interactive versions of the maps are available on-line at https://goo.gl/UBNFMQ (collaborative network) and https://goo.gl/WV25vm (research topics). Graphical Abstract ᅟ. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 55% |
| Scientists | 16 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Librarian | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 27% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,376,656
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#27
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,373
of 449,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.