↓ Skip to main content

Polar bears make little use of terrestrial food webs: evidence from stable-carbon isotope analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, May 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
Polar bears make little use of terrestrial food webs: evidence from stable-carbon isotope analysis
Published in
Oecologia, May 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00318328
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. A. Ramsay, K. A. Hobson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
India 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 228 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 20%
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Other 17 7%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 20 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 61%
Environmental Science 50 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 22 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#925
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,855
of 16,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.