↓ Skip to main content

Distribution of hallucinations in the population

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, November 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
436 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Distribution of hallucinations in the population
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, November 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00789221
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Y. Tien

Abstract

Hallucinations are often manifestations of severe psychiatric conditions seen clinically. However, little is known about the distribution of incident hallucinations in the community, nor whether there has been a change over the past century. Data from the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program is used here to provide descriptive information on the community distribution, and data from the Sidgewick study from a century earlier provides comparative information. In the ECA data, the incidence of visual hallucinations was slightly higher in males (about 20 per 1000 per year) than females (about 13 per 1000 per year) across the age span from 18 to 80 years old, with a subsequent increase in the rate for females (up to about 40 per 1000 per year) after age 80. For auditory hallucinations there was an age 25-30 peak in males with a trough for females, and a later age 40-50 peak for females. Overall, there were substantial gender differences, and the effect of aging to increase the incidence of hallucinations was the most consistent and prominent. The Sidgewick study showed a much higher proportion of visual hallucinations than the ECA program. This might be due to factors affecting brain function as well as social and psychological changes over time, although methodological weaknesses in both studies might also be responsible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 136 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 23%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#503,157
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#75
of 2,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56
of 16,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them