↓ Skip to main content

Oral Fludarabine

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Oral Fludarabine
Published in
Drugs, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00003495-200363210-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greg L. Plosker, David P. Figgitt

Abstract

Fludarabine is an antimetabolite antineoplastic agent used in the treatment of various haematological malignancies, particularly B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). An oral formulation of fludarabine has recently become available in the majority of European countries for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell CLL after initial treatment with an alkylating agent-based regimen. It is the first oral formulation of a purine analogue available for clinical use in B-cell CLL. Pharmacokinetic studies evaluating the bioavailability of oral fludarabine indicate that an oral dose of 40 mg/m2/day would provide similar systemic drug exposure to the standard intravenous dose of 25 mg/m2/day. A phase II study evaluated the clinical efficacy of six to eight cycles of oral fludarabine 40 mg/m2/day for 5 days of each 28-day cycle in 78 patients with previously treated B-cell CLL. Depending on the criteria used, the overall response rate was 46.2% (20.5% complete response [CR], 25.6% partial response [PR]) or 51.3% (17.9% CR, 33.3% PR). These results were similar to the 48% overall response rate reported in a similar historical control group treated with intravenous fludarabine. Myelosuppression (WHO grade 3 or 4) was the most frequently reported adverse effect with oral fludarabine therapy. Other common adverse effects included infection and gastrointestinal disturbances, although these were usually of mild to moderate severity (WHO grade 1 or 2). Overall, the tolerability profile of oral fludarabine is similar to that of the intravenous formulation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 22%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 33%
Chemistry 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#1,511
of 3,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,664
of 189,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#562
of 1,461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.