↓ Skip to main content

Identification of p53 as a Sequence-Specific DNA-Binding Protein

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
35 patents
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
940 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of p53 as a Sequence-Specific DNA-Binding Protein
Published in
Science, June 1991
DOI 10.1126/science.2047879
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott E. Kern, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Arthur Bruskin, David Jarosz, Paula Friedman, Carol Prives, Bert Vogelstein

Abstract

The tumor-suppressor gene p53 is altered by missense mutation in numerous human malignancies. However, the biochemical properties of p53 and the effect of mutation on these properties are unclear. A human DNA sequence was identified that binds specifically to wild-type human p53 protein in vitro. As few as 33 base pairs were sufficient to confer specific binding. Certain guanines within this 33-base pair region were critical, as methylation of these guanines or their substitution with thymine-abrogated binding. Human p53 proteins containing either of two missense mutations commonly found in human tumors were unable to bind significantly to this sequence. These data suggest that a function of p53 may be mediated by its ability to bind to specific DNA sequences in the human genome, and that this activity is altered by mutations that occur in human tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 196 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Student > Master 32 16%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 16%
Chemistry 17 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 28 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,627,460
of 24,490,209 outputs
Outputs from Science
#30,560
of 79,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#592
of 17,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#20
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,490,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.