↓ Skip to main content

The concept of major depression

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, April 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
The concept of major depression
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, April 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf02189537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Philipp, Wolfgang Maier, Cynthia D. Delmo

Abstract

All operationalized diagnostic systems contain a diagnostic category, which corresponds to the concept of major depression. Yet, these corresponding definitions are not identical. Up to now, no comprehensive comparisons of the competing diagnoses have been published. We will therefore present a series of studies, describing six different operational definitions of major depression according to their content and construction and empirically comparing them in large inpatient and outpatient samples. This first paper presents a descriptive comparison of the definitions given in the Feighner Diagnostic Criteria, the Research Diagnostic Criteria, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition and third edition, revised, and in two developmental drafts of the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for research (draft April 1987-I87; draft April 1989-I89). The descriptive comparison will demonstrate that there are many similarities, especially concerning the symptom-criteria of major depression. Classificatory relevance could only be assumed for those differences found for cut-offs, for time criteria and especially for exclusion criteria. Whether these differences are negligible and whether patients classified by different diagnostic systems are really comparable will be examined in subsequent publications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Psychology 5 23%
Energy 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#535
of 1,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,046
of 16,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them