You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Note on Relativity Before Einstein
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, June 1986
|
DOI | 10.1093/bjps/37.2.232 |
Authors |
M. N. Macrossan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 28% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 33% |
Philosophy | 2 | 11% |
Engineering | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
#363
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,008
of 10,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them