↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of firing frequency in nociceptive neurons by pro-inflammatory mediators

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Regulation of firing frequency in nociceptive neurons by pro-inflammatory mediators
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00221-009-1744-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aliakmal Momin, Peter A. McNaughton

Abstract

Nociceptive neurons generate trains of action potentials in response to painful stimuli, and the frequency of firing signals the intensity of the pain. Pro-inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) enhance the sensation of pain by increasing the frequency of action potential firing in response to a given level of painful stimulus. The mechanism by which the firing frequency is enhanced is discussed in the present review. One hypothesis proposes that the threshold for action potential initiation is lowered because the activation curve of a nociceptor-specific voltage-activated Na current, Na(V)1.8, is shifted to more negative values by PGE2. Recent measurements in our lab show, however, that the action potential threshold in fact changes little when AP firing is accelerated by PGE2. The enhanced firing is, however, abolished by a blocker of an inward current activated by hyperpolarisation, called I(h). The voltage sensitivity of I(h) shifts in the positive direction in small nociceptive neurons when they are exposed to pro-inflammatory mediators, such as PGE2, which activate adenylate cyclase and therefore increase levels of cAMP. By this mechanism the inward current between the resting membrane potential and the threshold for firing of action potentials is enhanced, and the rate of depolarisation in the interval between action potentials is therefore increased. We conclude that the major mechanism responsible for increasing action potential firing following tissue damage or metabolic stress is the hyperpolarisation-activated inward current, I(h), and that other mechanisms play at most a minor role.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
China 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,270,972
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#262
of 3,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,372
of 93,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.