↓ Skip to main content

Economic Aspects of Antibacterial Adverse Effects

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Economic Aspects of Antibacterial Adverse Effects
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, December 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-199813010-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul M. Beringer, Annie Wong-Beringer, Jay P. Rho

Abstract

The economic impact of adverse effects is often understated. Increased hospitalisations attributed to adverse drug reactions alone account for billions of dollars each year within the US healthcare system. Although most classes of antibacterials are well tolerated, severe reactions do occur and can add significantly to the cost of care. Among hospitalised patients, antibacterial adverse effects account for nearly 25% of adverse drug reactions. Published pharmacoeconomic data on direct and indirect costs of antibacterial adverse effects are lacking. The importance of determining the most cost-effective treatment regimen is becoming more apparent due to limited resources available within the healthcare system. When considering the cost of new antibacterials, a simple comparison of acquisition costs may not accurately reflect the true costs of treatment. A drug with a lower acquisition cost may be more toxic and/or less effective, resulting in higher complication rates and/or treatment failures, thus leading to a higher overall treatment cost. In addition, nephrotoxic agents such as aminoglycosides and vancomycin often require close monitoring of serum drug concentrations and creatinine levels, which also contributes to the total cost of therapy. Indirect costs as a result of reduced quality of life or loss of productivity are certainly not reflected in the acquisition costs of antimicrobials. Institutions must evaluate a drug's potential for causing and adverse event, among various other factors, when considering drugs for inclusion on their formularies. Drugs with good safety profiles may minimise hospitalisation or facilitate early discharge. Thus, the adverse effect profile of an antimicrobial agent can contribute significantly to its overall direct costs, primarily as a result of higher monitoring costs and additional days of hospitalisation. For example, in the US, the cost associated with adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity, observed with aminoglycosides and vancomycin, may add approximately $US2500 per patient with nephrotoxicity (1990 values). Indirect costs can also be substantial as a result of reduced productivity. Many adverse effects of antibacterial agents are predictable and may be minimised with appropriate monitoring and care. This article reviews the pharmacoeconomic aspects of adverse effects associated with some of the more important antibacterial classes such as the beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, vancomycin, macrolides and fluoroquinolones.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Psychology 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#973
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,428
of 290,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#100
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.