↓ Skip to main content

Discrete Approaches to Quantum Gravity in Four Dimensions

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Discrete Approaches to Quantum Gravity in Four Dimensions
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, December 1998
DOI 10.12942/lrr-1998-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renate Loll

Abstract

The construction of a consistent theory of quantum gravity is a problem in theoretical physics that has so far defied all attempts at resolution. One ansatz to try to obtain a non-trivial quantum theory proceeds via a discretization of space-time and the Einstein action. I review here three major areas of research: gauge-theoretic approaches, both in a path-integral and a Hamiltonian formulation; quantum Regge calculus; and the method of dynamical triangulations, confining attention to work that is strictly four-dimensional, strictly discrete, and strictly quantum in nature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 2 4%
Sweden 1 2%
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
France 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
China 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 44 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 8 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 37 67%
Mathematics 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Philosophy 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,794,096
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#73
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,713
of 109,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them