↓ Skip to main content

Dynamical Origin of Comets and Their Reservoirs

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Dynamical Origin of Comets and Their Reservoirs
Published in
Space Science Reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11214-008-9405-5
Authors

Martin J. Duncan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 46%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Other 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 63%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 21%
Chemistry 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,666,915
of 23,341,064 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#481
of 1,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,832
of 82,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,341,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.