Title |
Consensus on Training and Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Delphi Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00268-017-4436-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nader K. Francis, Thomas Walker, Fiona Carter, Martin Hübner, Angela Balfour, Dorthe Hjort Jakobsen, Jennie Burch, Tracy Wasylak, Nicolas Demartines, Dileep N. Lobo, Valerie Addor, Olle Ljungqvist |
Abstract |
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is widely accepted in current surgical practice due to its positive impact on patient outcomes. The successful implementation of ERAS is challenging and compliance with protocols varies widely. Continual staff education is essential for successful ERAS programmes. Teaching modalities exist, but there remains no agreement regarding the optimal training curriculum or how its effectiveness is assessed. We aimed to draw consensus from an expert panel regarding the successful training and implementation of ERAS. A modified Delphi technique was used; three rounds of questionnaires were sent to 58 selected international experts from 11 countries across multiple ERAS specialities and multidisciplinary teams (MDT) between January 2016 and February 2017. We interrogated opinion regarding four topics: (1) the components of a training curriculum and the structure of training courses; (2) the optimal framework for successful implementation and audit of ERAS including a guide for data collection; (3) a framework to assess the effectiveness of training; (4) criteria to define ERAS training centres of excellence. An ERAS training course must cover the evidence-based principles of ERAS with team-oriented training. Successful implementation requires strong leadership, an ERAS facilitator and an effective MDT. Effectiveness of training can be measured by improved compliance. A training centre of excellence should show a willingness to teach and demonstrable team working. We propose an international expert consensus providing an ERAS training curriculum, a framework for successful implementation, methods for assessing effectiveness of training and a definition of ERAS training centres of excellence. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 16% |
Italy | 3 | 6% |
Sweden | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 24% |
Scientists | 11 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 24% |
Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 37% |