Title |
Tool-assisted predation on a squirrel by a female chimpanzee in the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania
|
---|---|
Published in |
Primates, January 1993
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02381285 |
Authors |
Michael A. Huffman, Mohamedi Seifu Kalunde |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 57 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 47% |
Psychology | 7 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#470
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,985
of 65,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them