↓ Skip to main content

Molecular cell biology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Overview of attention for article published in neurogenetics, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 389)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Molecular cell biology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Published in
neurogenetics, March 2002
DOI 10.1007/s10048-002-0130-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Berger, Peter Young, Ueli Suter

Abstract

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), also named hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies, includes a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders affecting the peripheral nervous system. Traditionally, the different classes of CMT have been divided into demyelinating forms (CMT1, CMT3, and CMT4) and axonal forms (CMT2), a clinically very useful distinction. However, investigations of the underlying molecular and cellular disease mechanisms, mainly accomplished using cell culture and animal models, as well as specific re-examination of appropriate patient cohorts, have revealed that the pathological signs of myelinopathies and axonopathies are often intermingled. These findings, although only recently fully appreciated, are not surprising given the dependence and intimate cellular interactions of Schwann cells and neurons, mainly during nerve development and, as indicated by the pathology of CMT, also in the adult organism. This review is intended to summarize our current knowledge about the molecular and cellular basis of CMT, with a particular emphasis on the role of Schwann cell/axon interactions. Such a view is particularly timely since approximately ten genes have now been identified as culprits in different forms of CMT. This collection revealed novel crucial players in the interplay between Schwann cells and neurons. The analysis of these genes and their encoded proteins will provide additional insights into the molecular and cellular basis of neuropathies and valuable information about the biology and interactions of Schwann cells, their associated neurons, endoneurial fibroblasts, and the nerve-surrounding and protecting perineurial sheath.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from neurogenetics
#31
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,839
of 48,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from neurogenetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them