↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of Soft Tissue Filler Complications: Expert Consensus Recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,347)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of Soft Tissue Filler Complications: Expert Consensus Recommendations
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00266-017-1063-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Urdiales-Gálvez, Nuria Escoda Delgado, Vitor Figueiredo, José V. Lajo-Plaza, Mar Mira, Antonio Moreno, Francisco Ortíz-Martí, Rosa del Rio-Reyes, Nazaret Romero-Álvarez, Sofía Ruiz del Cueto, María A. Segurado, Cristina Villanueva Rebenaque

Abstract

Dermal fillers have been increasingly used in minimally invasive facial esthetic procedures. This widespread use has led to a rise in reports of associated complications. The aim of this expert consensus report is to describe potential adverse events associated with dermal fillers and to provide guidance on their treatment and avoidance. A multidisciplinary group of experts in esthetic treatments convened to discuss the management of the complications associated with dermal fillers use. A search was performed for English, French, and Spanish language articles in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar using the search terms "complications" OR "soft filler complications" OR "injectable complications" AND "dermal fillers" AND "Therapy". An initial document was drafted by the Coordinating Committee, and it was reviewed and modified by the experts, until a final text was agreed upon and validated. The panel addressed consensus recommendations about the classification of filler complications according to the time of onset and about the clinical management of different complications including bruising, swelling, edema, infections, lumps and bumps, skin discoloration, and biofilm formation. Special attention was paid to vascular compromise and retinal artery occlusion. Clinicians should be fully aware of the signs and symptoms related to complications and be prepared to confidently treat them. Establishing action protocols for emergencies, with agents readily available in the office, would reduce the severity of adverse outcomes associated with injection of hyaluronic acid fillers in the cosmetic setting. This document seeks to lay down a set of recommendations and to identify key issues that may be useful for clinicians who are starting to use dermal fillers. Additionally, this document provides a better understanding about the diagnoses and management of complications if they do occur. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 303 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Postgraduate 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 9%
Other 24 8%
Researcher 20 7%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 112 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 117 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#586,195
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#17
of 1,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,505
of 455,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.