↓ Skip to main content

Chimpanzees in Bwindi-Impenetrable National Park, Uganda, use different tools to obtain different types of honey

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Chimpanzees in Bwindi-Impenetrable National Park, Uganda, use different tools to obtain different types of honey
Published in
Primates, July 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02557602
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig B. Stanford, Caleb Gambaneza, John Bosco Nkurunungi, Michele L. Goldsmith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 52%
Psychology 6 10%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#470
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,390
of 38,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them