↓ Skip to main content

運動発達研究の理論的基礎と課題:Gesell,McGraw,Thelen,三者の比較検討から

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
運動発達研究の理論的基礎と課題:Gesell,McGraw,Thelen,三者の比較検討から
Published in
Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology, June 2016
DOI 10.11201/jjdp.25.183
Authors

山本 尚樹

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,726,252
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology
#98
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,159
of 353,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.