↓ Skip to main content

Callitrichids as phyletic dwarfs, and the place of the callitrichidae in platyrrhini

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, January 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Callitrichids as phyletic dwarfs, and the place of the callitrichidae in platyrrhini
Published in
Primates, January 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf02383822
Authors

Susan M. Ford

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,714,942
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#476
of 1,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,807
of 28,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.