↓ Skip to main content

Linguistic Relativity in Japanese and English: Is Language the Primary Determinant in Object Classification?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of East Asian Linguistics, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 119)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Linguistic Relativity in Japanese and English: Is Language the Primary Determinant in Object Classification?
Published in
Journal of East Asian Linguistics, October 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1008356620617
Authors

Reiko Mazuka, Ronald S. Friedman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 34%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 17 49%
Psychology 7 20%
Arts and Humanities 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of East Asian Linguistics
#9
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,179
of 38,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of East Asian Linguistics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them