↓ Skip to main content

Study of marine bacteria inactivation by photochemical processes: disinfection kinetics and growth modeling after treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Study of marine bacteria inactivation by photochemical processes: disinfection kinetics and growth modeling after treatment
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-1185-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Moreno-Andrés, Asunción Acevedo-Merino, Enrique Nebot

Abstract

The importance of seawater treatment in order to avoid microbiological pollution related to aquaculture or ballast water management has increased during the last few years. Bacterial indicators used for the evaluation of different disinfection treatments are usually related with both waste and drinking water, these standards are not usual microorganisms found in seawater. Thus, it is thought necessary to study the behavior of different marine-specific organisms in regard to improve the disinfection processes in seawater. In this study, three different bacteria have been selected among major groups of bacterial community from marine waters: two water-associated, Roseobacter sp. and Pseudomonas litoralis, and one sediment-associated, Kocuria rhizophila. A kinetic inactivation model together with a post-treatment growth tendency has been obtained after the application of UV-C and UV/H2O2 processes. According to the first kinetic rate constant, different responses were obtained for the different bacterial groups. Once the treatment was applied, modeling of growth curves revealed high recover within the first 3 days after treatment, even when UV/H2O2 was applied. This study introduces a sensitivity index, in which results show different levels of resistance for both treatments, being Roseobacter sp. the most sensitive bacteria, followed by P. litoralis and K. rhizophila.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Researcher 6 20%
Unspecified 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 17%
Engineering 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Chemistry 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,471,182
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#583
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,251
of 448,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#21
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.