↓ Skip to main content

Procedures, Resources and Selected Results of the Deep Ecliptic Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Moon, and Planets, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Procedures, Resources and Selected Results of the Deep Ecliptic Survey
Published in
Earth, Moon, and Planets, June 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:moon.0000031930.13823.be
Authors

M. W. Buie, R. L. Millis, L. H. Wasserman, J. L. Elliot, S. D. Kern, K. B. Clancy, E. I. Chiang, A. B. Jordan, K. J. Meech, R. M. Wagner, D. E. Trilling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#82
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,537
of 53,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.