↓ Skip to main content

Transferable resistance to cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cefamandole and cefuroxime in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, November 1983
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
711 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
Title
Transferable resistance to cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cefamandole and cefuroxime in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens
Published in
Infection, November 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf01641355
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Knothe, P. Shah, V. Krcmery, M. Antal, S. Mitsuhashi

Abstract

In conjugational crosses, three Klebsiella pneumoniae strains and one Serratia marcescens strain have been demonstrated to transfer resistance determinants to newer types of cephalosporins. While Klebsiella strains donated cefotaxime, cefamandole and cefuroxime resistance to Escherichia coli K-12 recipients, the genetic analysis of exconjugants after the transfer of plasmids from Serratia strains to Proteus or Salmonella recipients showed that the cefoxitin resistance determinant was also co-transferred. In subsequent transfer cycles of this plasmid, cefotaxime and cefoxitin resistance determinants segregated in contrast to the relative stability of plasmids derived from Klebsiella strains in subsequent transfer cycles. From results obtained in this study, it may be concluded that in some strains of nosocomial Enterobacteriaceae, resistance to newer cephalosporins could be transmissible and thus plasmid-located.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 419 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 18%
Student > Master 64 15%
Student > Bachelor 58 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 7%
Other 61 14%
Unknown 96 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 69 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 59 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 3%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 120 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,927,173
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#163
of 1,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311
of 8,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them