↓ Skip to main content

Geologic Setting, Field Survey and Modeling of the Chimbote, Northern Peru, Tsunami of 21 February 1996

Overview of attention for article published in Pure and Applied Geophysics, May 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Geologic Setting, Field Survey and Modeling of the Chimbote, Northern Peru, Tsunami of 21 February 1996
Published in
Pure and Applied Geophysics, May 1999
DOI 10.1007/s000240050242
Authors

J. Bourgeois, C. Petroff, H. Yeh, V. Titov, C. E. Synolakis, B. Benson, J. Kuroiwa, J. Lander, E. Norabuena

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 5%
Japan 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
New Caledonia 1 2%
Unknown 36 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Researcher 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 51%
Engineering 5 12%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#188
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,548
of 36,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.