↓ Skip to main content

On the Rayleigh–Taylor Instability in Presence of a Background Shear

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
On the Rayleigh–Taylor Instability in Presence of a Background Shear
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00021-018-0362-9
Authors

Roman Shvydkoy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
#68
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,538
of 445,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.