↓ Skip to main content

Detection of angiographically significant coronary obstruction using resting transthoracic coronary Doppler echocardiography

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Echocardiography, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 112)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Detection of angiographically significant coronary obstruction using resting transthoracic coronary Doppler echocardiography
Published in
Journal of Echocardiography, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12574-017-0366-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Cozzarin, Gerardo Manuel Marambio, Daniel Ernesto Ferreiro, Maria Fernanda Gonda, Lorena Romina Balletti, Martin Hernán Medawar, Juan Alberto Gagliardi, Tomás Francisco Cianciulli

Abstract

Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography has shown that significant stenosis can be detected based on the presence of aliasing with color Doppler in the stenotic area. The study aimed to assess the detection of angiographically significant coronary stenosis (ASCS) by analyzing the characteristics and velocities of resting coronary artery flow (RCF) using transthoracic coronary Doppler echocardiography (TCDE). TCDE was performed before diagnostic coronary angiography (CA). The following velocities were measured: peak systolic velocity (PSV), peak diastolic velocity (PDV), mean diastolic velocity (MDV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and distal to proximal velocity ratios. Twenty-five patients were included, and CA revealed ASCS in 14 patients. With TCDE, the proximal and distal portions of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) could be measured in 84% of cases. Among 12 patients with ASCS in the distal left main coronary artery (LMCA) or proximal or mid LAD, proximal and distal flow could be measured in ten patients. Proximal diastolic velocities were higher in patients with ASCS in the LAD, and a distal MDV/proximal MDV ratio < 0.5 had a 60% sensitivity and a 92% specificity for the detection of ASCS (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.56-0.92). For the detection of ASCS limited to the LMCA and/or proximal LAD, the distal MDV/proximal MDV ratio had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 89% (AUC 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-0.99). Resting TCDE can detect ASCS in the LAD, particularly at the proximal level, analyzing the ratio between distal and proximal flow velocities. These results could not be demonstrated in the RCA and CX arteries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,502,482
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Echocardiography
#29
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,751
of 440,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Echocardiography
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them