↓ Skip to main content

Recombinant prion protein induces a new transmissible prion disease in wild-type animals

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Recombinant prion protein induces a new transmissible prion disease in wild-type animals
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00401-009-0633-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natallia Makarava, Gabor G. Kovacs, Olga Bocharova, Regina Savtchenko, Irina Alexeeva, Herbert Budka, Robert G. Rohwer, Ilia V. Baskakov

Abstract

Prion disease is a neurodegenerative malady, which is believed to be transmitted via a prion protein in its abnormal conformation (PrP(Sc)). Previous studies have failed to demonstrate that prion disease could be induced in wild-type animals using recombinant prion protein (rPrP) produced in Escherichia coli. Here, we report that prion infectivity was generated in Syrian hamsters after inoculating full-length rPrP that had been converted into the cross-beta-sheet amyloid form and subjected to annealing. Serial transmission gave rise to a disease phenotype with highly unique clinical and neuropathological features. Among them were the deposition of large PrP(Sc) plaques in subpial and subependymal areas in brain and spinal cord, very minor lesioning of the hippocampus and cerebellum, and a very slow progression of disease after onset of clinical signs despite the accumulation of large amounts of PrP(Sc) in the brain. The length of the clinical duration is more typical of human and large animal prion diseases, than those of rodents. Our studies establish that transmissible prion disease can be induced in wild-type animals by inoculation of rPrP and introduce a valuable new model of prion diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lithuania 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Master 8 6%
Professor 7 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Chemistry 7 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,803,580
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#708
of 2,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,981
of 164,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.