↓ Skip to main content

How the diversity, abundance, size and climbing mechanisms of woody lianas are related to biotic and abiotic factors in a subtropical secondary forest, Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Geobotanica, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
How the diversity, abundance, size and climbing mechanisms of woody lianas are related to biotic and abiotic factors in a subtropical secondary forest, Taiwan
Published in
Folia Geobotanica, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12224-017-9306-z
Authors

Sheng-Zehn Yang, Hsuan Fan, Kuan-Wei Li, Teng-Yao Ko

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 40%
Environmental Science 5 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,963,216
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#123
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,246
of 442,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.