↓ Skip to main content

Basement membranes in skin: unique matrix structures with diverse functions?

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Basement membranes in skin: unique matrix structures with diverse functions?
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00418-009-0586-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk Breitkreutz, Nicolae Mirancea, Roswitha Nischt

Abstract

The view of extracellular matrix (ECM) has evolved from a merely scaffolding and space filling tissue element to an interface actively controlling cellular activities and tissue functions. A highly specialized form of ECM is the basement membrane (BM), an ubiquitous sheet-like polymeric structure composed of a set of distinct glycoproteins and proteoglycans. In this review we are largely focusing on function and assembly of BM in skin (1) at the dermo-epidermal interface and (2) in the resident micro-vasculature. The role of the non-polymeric components perlecan and particularly nidogen is exemplified by reviewing experiments based on genetic approaches and adequate experimental skin models in vivo and in vitro. While in mice total deficiency of one of these components is eventually developmentally lethal, the severity of the defects varies drastically between tissues and also the skin models recapitulating BM formation in vitro. There is accumulating evidence that this relies on the mechanical properties, the molecular composition of the BM, the adjacent ECM or connective tissue, the dynamics of molecular assembly, and 'minor' tissue-specific modifier or adapter components. Though the role of nidogen or perlecan is still remaining a controversial issue, the statements 'being essential for BM/or not' should be consequently referred to the developmental, tissue, and functional (e.g., repair) context.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 191 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 43 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Engineering 17 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 40 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#327
of 1,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,293
of 111,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.