| Title |
Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychology Review, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11065-009-9097-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice Medalia, Jimmy Choi |
| Abstract |
Cognitive deficits are routinely evident in schizophrenia, and are of sufficient magnitude to influence functional outcomes in work, social functioning and illness management. Cognitive remediation is an evidenced-based non-pharmacological treatment for the neurocognitive deficits seen in schizophrenia. Narrowly defined, cognitive remediation is a set of cognitive drills or compensatory interventions designed to enhance cognitive functioning, but from the vantage of the psychiatric rehabilitation field, cognitive remediation is a therapy which engages the patient in learning activities that enhance the neurocognitive skills relevant to their chosen recovery goals. Cognitive remediation programs vary in the extent to which they reflect these narrow or broader perspectives but six meta-analytic studies report moderate range effect sizes on cognitive test performance, and daily functioning. Reciprocal interactions between baseline ability level, the type of instructional techniques used, and motivation provide some explanatory power for the heterogeneity in patient response to cognitive remediation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 273 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 21% |
| Unknown | 42 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 148 | 52% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,180,369
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#157
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,065
of 92,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them