↓ Skip to main content

Vulture Investors, Predators of the 90s: An Ethical Examination

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Vulture Investors, Predators of the 90s: An Ethical Examination
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, April 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1005718715162
Authors

A. Scott Carson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 7 47%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,338
of 3,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,370
of 32,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.