↓ Skip to main content

Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/jhep05(2013)135
Authors

Andrew Hodges

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 58%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 30 79%
Mathematics 3 8%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#3,232
of 24,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,560
of 207,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#31
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.