↓ Skip to main content

Summer dormancy as a refuge from mortality in the freshwater bryozoan Plumatella emarginata

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Summer dormancy as a refuge from mortality in the freshwater bryozoan Plumatella emarginata
Published in
Oecologia, June 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-0946-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Callaghan, R. Karlson

Abstract

In expanding populations, individuals that produce dormant offspring when conditions are otherwise suitable for growth and reproduction incur a cost, since the dormant life stage delays reproduction. These individuals are at a disadvantage unless (1) there is not enough time for reproduction to occur before the environment degrades, or (2) the probability of death in the non-dormant state is high. Here we investigate resting stages of the freshwater bryozoan Plumatella emarginata to test the prediction that delayed emergence from dormancy can be related to seasonal fluctuations in mortality. Our results show that emergence in late spring and summer occurs at much lower frequencies than in early spring and is strongly associated with high mortality, at least in part due to predation. We document significant reductions in the growth and survival of plumatellid colonies during the summer in the presence of the crayfish Orconectes limosus. Thus summer dormancy provides a significant refuge from predation. Dormant resting stages during the winter also experience significant mortality. Our results are consistent with the general notions that (1) the proportion of colonies emerging from dormancy reflects tradeoffs in the relative risks of mortality in dormant versus non-dormant states, and (2) temporal shifts in the risk of mortality influence the timing of life-cycle transitions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 31%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 50%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 14%
Environmental Science 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2009.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,672
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,616
of 120,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.