| Title |
Asthma and Medicines – Long-Term Side-Effects, Monitoring and Dose Titration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12098-017-2553-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satnam Kaur, Varinder Singh |
| Abstract |
Asthma is a major pediatric respiratory morbidity requiring long-term management. A thorough knowledge of long-term medication side-effects in children is, thus, essential for every physician dealing with childhood asthma. Establishing diagnosis and initiating treatment is just a beginning of the journey. Ongoing monitoring is an essential component of comprehensive asthma management programme. Monitoring includes not only assessment of asthma control but also checking for adherence to treatment, technique of inhaler device use, associated co-morbities, if any, and potential environmental exposure. Various tools - both subjective and objective - are available for assessment of asthma control. However, evidence for their optimum use in different settings and patient groups is lacking and monitoring has to be customized depending on available resources and individual patient characteristics. Patient education is an important component of long-term asthma therapy. The ultimate aim is to achieve optimum asthma control i.e., achieve and maintain control of clinical symptoms, decrease future risk to patients (risk of exacerbations, progressive loss of lung function and development of fixed airflow obstruction, adverse effects of medications) and enabling the child to lead a life without restrictions, at lowest possible dose of drugs. This article reviews the side-effects of medications used for long-term management of asthma and discusses current literature on asthma monitoring and dose titration in pediatric population to help the asthma therapist not only prescribe the drugs rationally but also help the family make right choices for treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,458,307
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#1,283
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,273
of 442,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.